“the saint attempted, in the place called Gaesmere…to fell a certain oak of extraordinary size, which is called, by an old name of the pagans, the Oak of Jupiter….But when the fore side of the tree was notched only a little, suddenly the oak’s vast bulk, driven by a blast from above, crashed to the ground, shivering its crown of branches as it fell; and, as if by the gracious compensation of the Most High, it was also burst into four parts, and four trunks of huge size, equal in length, were seen, unwrought by the brethren who stood by. At this sight the pagans who before had cursed now, on the contrary, believed, and blessed the Lord, and put away their former reviling.”
In one of the most famous and splendidly triumphalist scenes in Christian hagiography, the 8th century Christian chronicler Willibald depicts the destruction of the fabled Donar Oak by St. Boniface, an English missionary, which marked the beginning of the end of Germanic paganism and served as one of the definite symbolic catalysts of the new Germanic Christian middle ages. At the same time, this scene is strangely apropos to the contemporary religious divide in the mighty oak of American conservativism. If the mushrooming of neo-pagan, “esoteric” Facebook pages, Twitter accounts, and blogs is an indication, many traditional conservatives, especially members of the Alt Right, want to replant the mystic oak chopped down by St. Boniface. And a vexatious series of questions has arisen among many who are rediscovering traditional ways of life. Is Christianity at fault for the death of the West? Were the condemnations of Christianity as a fundamentally effeminizing Eastern religion that sapped the life blood of Western civilization made by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and Enlightenment English historian Edward Gibbon right in the end? Would a return to pre-Christian ways of life and even worship make the West great again?
The first response from traditional Catholics is that St. Augustine of Hippo in his weighty City of God already answered this question 1700 years ago—long before Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals and Gibbon in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: the answer is “no”, it was the distinctly pagan immorality and corruption of the both the Romans of the later empire and the Europeans of late modernity that should have received Gibbon and Nietzsche’s scorn. In fact, the arrival of Christian missionaries in Europe, winding their way up the Viking-infested rivers and through the dark unconsecrated forests, was welcomed by the average pagan. While the testy Scandinavians resisted Christianity and were among the first to abandon it to Luther’s new religion, our European ancestors welcomed the missionaries who relieved them from the terrible burden of human sacrifice and fear under pagan rule, and, to this day, Catholics have served at the forefront of preserving and defending European civilization.
Whether we like it or not, traditional Catholics have been placed among the “Alt Right”; in fact, as Wikileaks has revealed, the left views “backwards” Catholics as among the principle leaders of the conservative movement. John Halpin, a senior fellow at the leftist Center for American Progress, infamously wrote to Hillary Clinton’s campaign director of communications, Jennifer Palmieri, as well as the notorious “spirit cooker” John Podesta that “Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts).” Nestled in among libertarians, fire and brimstone Protestants, monarchists, young black fogeys, Shi’ite Muslims, white nationalists, Confucians, futurists, fascists, conspiracy theorists, Final Fantasy aficionados, and Milo Yiannopoulos, are traditional Catholics, a group that like the others, firmly rejects the label “Alt-Right” but cannot seem to escape it. However, as recent Twitter and Facebook exchanges have proven, there is a growing rift between Christian traditionalists and neo-pagan or secular members of the Alt-Right. This rift has existed in the American right for a long time. When asked what the difference is between David Duke and himself, the grandpappy of modern American conservativism and devout Catholic, Patrick Buchanan stated in an interview with ABC’s David Brinkley in the early 90s: “I’m a Catholic, a conservative, a traditionalist….We come from different traditions.” It is this point that still divides the right. David Duke cannot gain the same level of electoral support he once did 25 years ago, but his intellectual children have come to make daily national news and are one of the strongest and most aggressive political presences on social media. When in his “Culture Wars” speech, Buchanan announced to the 1992 Republican National Convention that “we must take back our cities, and take back our culture, and take back our country”, he was not talking about a race war; he was talking a spiritual war. It is only traditional Catholics who are equipped to fight this war, but, at the same time, we need the energy, bravado, and intelligence of the Alt Right, but it must be an Alt Right restrained by a truly Christian culture.
The Alt Right is rightly disgusted with the buddy Jesus, high-fiving Evangelical Catholicism, but they are wrong to think this sentimental and effeminate Christianity is the Christianity that was given to the Irish by St. Patrick or to the Slavic people by Saints Cyril and Methodius. The Christianity of the Beowulf poet or that of St. Thomas Aquinas, himself a member of an aristocratic Norman-Italian family, is not the Christianity of Pope Francis or Rick Warren. For two millennia, the borders of Europe were defended by Christian knights who shed their blood fighting waves of migrants seeking to chain our ancestors under the yoke of Islam.
Catholics were reactionary before being reactionary was Tweetable. Catholics do not so much reject the modern world as what the modern world is, is a rejection of Catholicism. European people were disgusted and bored in the 19th century reading the poems of Baudelaire, Poe, and Rimbaud when the majority of our countries were 99% white precisely because we had abandoned Christ for Odin, Zeus, and worship of the fatherland. Indo-European people began to destroy themselves when they rejected their baptism and turned their back on God. Today, the reason why countries like Hungary and Poland resist Islamization and globalization because they have kept their faith; they want to live, and they want to live for Christ.
The future of our civilization can only be built on the one firm foundation of Jesus Christ, Our Lord. The driving force of true arête or excellence for European people has been, since the time of Constantine, what St. Ignatius of Loyola called ad majorem dei gloriam, all for greater glory of God. It was the love of Christ that inspired Columbus to sail across the Atlantic and Cortez to destroy the pagan Aztec empire. It was the greater glory of God that impelled the construction of the great gothic Cathedrals of Europe, modeled on the mead halls and dragon ships of Vikings who skimmed the seas. Our drive for excellence as a people cannot simply be the desire for honor or the glory of the family or the wider fellowship or comitatus of white folks, for all of this is merely morbid materialism without the hope of salvation or eternal life.
We must have a moral awakening and call to conversion to the one true faith of our fathers. We cannot ask God to defend us from an army of faux refugees seeking to trample underfoot the family of Western nations if the majority of Westerners, are as, Katy Perry and AC/DC sang at the 2015 Grammy awards, “on a highway to hell.” If we kill our own offspring for eugenic or other reasons—as has been suggested in the pages of the scholarly Alt Right Radix journal—we are still on the road to self-extermination, for, just as it is hard just to hate one group of people without ending up hating everyone, once the killing starts, it is hard to stop We have already tried to save ourselves with adulation of our race, culture, and technological achievements, and that experiment ended with cyanide and a gun shot on April 30, 1945.
After the success of Trump and the likely future triumph of nationalist parties in Europe, the Alt Right is thus face with the choice presented by the great French mathematician and philosopher of the 17th century, Blaise Pascal. Pascal posed that the newly enlightened and reformed men and women of the modern period were burdened with a choice: to live their life as if God did or did not exist, weighing the ultimate consequences of their actions—Pascal, of course, argues that it is better to bet on the Christian life, for “if you win, you win everything: if you lose, you lose nothing.” This is a choice that each member of those who identify with the pagan or secular wing of the Alt Right must make at his or her own. If you do choose to take the “trad pill,” here are a few suggestions. First of all, find a local Catholic Church where the traditional Latin mass is celebrated—if not, find an Eastern Catholic Church cloaked in incense and robed in icons. Secondly, read. As a general rule, if a Catholic book has “Saint” before the author’s name is a good place to start. If something was written after 1962, (for the most part) avoid it. Thirdly, learn and pray the rosary. Finally, realize that the planned physical extermination of our people and culture is only a side effect of a diabolical scheme to exterminate the remnants of Christian culture that still haunt the ruins of Western civilization. The foundation of our civilization is not our DNA or skin color and to grasp for salvation in the tombs of our ancestors is to choose an empty and boring mortality. It is time for the Alt Right to “repent and believe in the Gospel” and make Christendom great again.